Tag Archive | capitalism

Income Inequality…Naomi Klein

Naomi Klein is a treasure and if you haven’t read her books, No Logo, The Shock Doctrine, or This Changes Everything, Capitalism vs. the Climate…then, well, you should.



Not the Greatest Place to Raise Children…

I saw this article on Alternet today and wanted to share it.  It would be hard to say which one is necessarily the worst with regard to raising a family as all of them contribute significantly.  With that being said, however, I think that privatized healthcare and the massive underfunding of education are the two issues that have effectively kept the U.S. spiraling downward.

9 Reasons Why America Is a Terrible Place to Raise Kids

As the GOP presidential primary heats up and the 2016 election draws closer, Republicans have been pandering to their far-right evangelical base and blaming social liberalism for the decline of “family values” in the United States. Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal insists that liberals are declaring war on families and religious liberty [3]; former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee has been beating the culture war [4] drum and railing against abortion, gay rights, feminism, same-sex marriage and sexy images in pop music. And as usual, Republicans are overlooking the real reason why so many Americans are either delaying or opting out of parenthood [5]: economic stress. The U.S. Department of Agriculture projects that the average cost of raising a child born in 2013 will exceed $245,000, and birth rates among women in their 20 have reached an historic low in the U.S. (according to the Centers for Disease Control). America’s middle class has been facing a full-fledged economic assault, making it harder and harder to take on the colossal expense of parenthood [6].

Below are 10 major reasons why the U.S., more and more, has become a terrible place to raise a family [7] unless you’re rich.

1. The High Cost of Childcare

American families are facing a variety of rising costs in 2015, from food to housing. But one of the biggest expenses of all is turning out to be childcare. A 2014 report by Child Care Aware of America found that daycare could be as high as $14,508 per year [8] for an infant and $12,280 per year for a four-year-old. And that is, in a sense, more troubling for new parents than the high cost of college tuition: while that expense is 17 or 18 years in the future, daycare is an expense working parents face right away.

2. Stagnant Wages Combined With Ever-Increasing Cost of Living

A 2014 report by the Center for American Progress offered little reason to be optimistic about family life in the U.S. The Center found that “investing in the basic pillars of middle-class security—child care [9], housing and healthcare, as well as setting aside modest savings for retirement and college—cost an alarming $10,600 more in 2012 than it did in 2000.” To make matters worse, the Center reported, incomes for most Americans remained stagnant during that 12-year period.

3. Public Education Is Struggling, and Private Schools Are Unaffordable

The economic meltdown of September 2008 has been bad news for American families on multiple levels. When families are struggling financially and have less money to spend, that harms a variety of businesses. And lower income also means less tax revenue, which harms public education because public education is funded with income taxes as well as sales and property taxes. In 2014, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities reported that at least 35 states had less funding per student than they did before the Great Recession—and 14 of those states had cut per-student funding by over 10% [10]. Some parents will send their kids to private schools, but only if they can afford to: in 2014, the National Association of Independent Schools (NAIS) found that annual tuition for private high schools [11] in the U.S. ranged from an average of $13,500 in the southern states to $29,000 in the western states to over $30,000 in the northeastern states.

4. Astronomical College Tuition

During the Fathers Knows Best/Leave It to Beaver era Republicans romanticize, a college degree practically guaranteed a middle-class income for families. College was much more affordable in those days, but now, a college education is more expensive than ever [12]—tuition costs have more than doubled since the 1980s, and there is no guarantee that a four-year degree or even a masters will lead to the type of job one needs to support a family. A college degree costs more now but delivers less. In the 1950s and 1960s, college graduates working in low-paying, dead-end service jobs was unheard of; now, it’s common. And someone making $8 or $9 an hour is going to have a very hard time paying off a six-figure student loan debt [13] and starting a family.

5. The High Cost of Healthcare

Healthcare is a colossal expense for families in the U.S. The Affordable Care Act of 2010 has brought about some desperately needed improvements: for example, health insurance companies can no longer deny health insurance to a child who has a preexisting condition, such as Type 1 diabetes. But the ACA, which was greatly influenced by health insurance lobbyists, needs to be expanded considerably before it offers families the types of protections that are the norm in France or Sweden—and Republicans in Congress continue to fight Obamacare every step of the way. Raising a healthy child is still much easier in Europe than in the U.S.

6. The Decline of Organized Labor

In Wisconsin, Gov. Scott Walker has been calling for a 20-week abortion ban [14] in his state and reminding anti-abortion groups that he has a history of defunding Planned Parenthood. But if Walker is really concerned about families, he should reconsider his opposition to organized labor. It is no coincidence that when roughly 35% of American private-sector workers belonged to unions in the mid-1950s, it was much easier to start a family: collective bargaining promoted economic stability for the middle class. But in 2014, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported that the unionization rate in the U.S. was a mere 6.6% for private-sector workers [15] and 11.1% when private-sector and public-sector workers were combined. The BLS also reported that non-union workers were only earning 79% of what unionized workers were earning. At a time when union membership in the U.S. is the lowest it has been in almost 100 years, Walker just made Wisconsin a right-to-work state [16], which will bring union membership down even more.

7. U.S. Still Lags Behind in Paid Maternity Leave

The U.S. is the only country in the developed world that still lacks mandatory paid maternity leave [17]. That is quite a contrast to Europe, where government-mandated paid maternity leave ranges from 81 weeks in Austria to 47 weeks in Italy to 42 weeks in France, the Netherlands, Luxembourg and the Republic of Ireland. Meanwhile, in the Pacific region, paid maternity leave ranges from 18 weeks in Australia to 58 weeks in Japan. Paid maternity leave is strictly optional in the U.S., where according to the organization Moms Rising, 51% of new mothers have no paid maternity leave at all [18].

8. Stagnant Minimum Wage

If the U.S.’ national minimum wage had kept up with inflation, it would be much higher than its current rate of $7.25 an hour. President Barack Obama has proposed raising it to $10.10 per hour, while economist Robert Reich favors raising it to $15 an hour [19] nationally. Raising the minimum wage would hardly be a panacea for American families, but it would be a step in the right direction. However, even Obama’s proposed $10.10 per hour is unlikely to come about as long as far-right Republicans are dominating both houses of Congress.

9. Outsourcing and the Loss of American Manufacturing Jobs

Thanks to globalization, neoliberal economics and disastrous trade deals such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), the U.S. has been steadily losing manufacturing jobs for decades. A study by the Economic Policy Institute found that in 2011, globalization had depressed wages for non-college-educated Americans by 5.5%. [20] And now, both Republicans and the Obama administration are pushing for the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), a free-trade deal that opponents have been calling “NAFTA on steroids [21].” Resulting in more manufacturing jobs being outsourced, TPP will make life even worse for blue-collar families in the U.S.


Making sense of the banking industry…

Click to show "Goldman Sachs" result 23

A while back I posted about The Big Business of America and, in particular, about the idea of a businessperson being the best candidate for president.  If you don’t want to go back and look at the post, basically I said that I have never understood the reasoning behind a “business” person being someone who can run the country.  The country is not a business for profit and should not be treated as such.  Okay, so back to this post…

I recently watched a video (at bottom) about income inequality and bank bonuses that got me thinking about…well, Goldman Sachs.  I have always known that employees of Goldman Sachs were paid extremely well (staggering – just watch the video) but I often wondered why.   Well, let us start at the very top with Mr. Lloyd Blankfein.

Click to show "Goldman Sachs" result 22

Mr. Blankfein’s salary went up nearly 15% to $16.2 million although Goldman Sachs will argue that it looks that way because of stock awards from previous years that vested last year.  You can read about it in this Reuters article from last month.  Regardless…it is a lot of money to pay one person.  Okay, so Mr. Blankfein made a lot of money…great.  What did he do to actually earn that much?  Goldman Sachs actually saw their profits dive and the share price went from $174/share in January 11′ to $94/share in December.  Now, math may not be my strongest subject, but I can see a drop of nearly 50% in a year (and there was no stock split).

Now yes, Goldman Sachs makes a ton of money…billions in profits, but since they had a tougher year this is what they did…

Management reduced the average employee’s pay by 15 percent in 2011, to $367,057. That compares with a pre-crisis high of $568,732 per employee in 2007. The median household income in the United States is about $50,000.

Goldman Sachs does not just have a few people working for them…they employ in excess of 38,000 people.   That computes to a lot of money.  Okay, back to my point.  Goldman Sachs continued:

Goldman also reported compensation for its four other named executive officers: Gary Cohn, president and chief operating officer; David Viniar, chief financial officer; J. Michael Evans, vice chairman and head of emerging markets; and John Weinberg, vice chairman and co-head of investment banking.

Each of these executives received performance-based pay of $11.85 million last year, which included a $1.85 million salary and a $3 million bonus.

Using the SEC’s calculation of 2011 pay, which includes previous years’ awards that vested in 2011, Cohn, Viniar and Weinberg received $15.8 million last year, while Evans received $15.7 million.

Performance-based pay???  For a stock that slid nearly 50%?  Wow!  Those guys must be great at what they do!  Okay, is there something wrong with this picture?  I wonder how much they would have made had the company improved profits and share price.  The point is that the banking industry is so crooked right now that it is simply staggering.  We have a financial meltdown in 2008 where our “capitalist” cronies on Wall Street ask for a “socialist” bailout.  These people should be being compensated, they should be put in jail.  Running the financial industry into the ground…asking taxpayers to bail them out…and then walking home with bonuses….

Maybe they just have this whole thing figured out……..

Great video by the Young Turks: