What we should be teaching…


I ran across this excellent article on truthdig today.  I agree with Reeves completely on the issue that we should be training more doctors and nurses.  We need much more investment in the crumbling infrastructure of America.

Train Doctors and Nurses, Not Soldiers

Posted on Aug 3, 2012

By Richard Reeves

Some days, I feel I have seen it all. Other days, I just don’t want to get out of bed. Over eight years my family has been hit with lung cancer, brain cancer, strokes and various other medical calamities. My wife has had eight operations, in the United States and in France.

For what it is worth, my wife and I have the best medical insurance money can buy. But it adds up, and sooner or later you are broken, as the bills, the “incidentals,” pile up and up. One day, you give up your club membership here and the next you cancel your subscription to The New Yorker. So it goes. It must be much worse for families with smaller incomes.

Your life becomes a blur of men and women in white and green. These days the people in white tend to be Asian, most of them female. Often, the people in green, the nurses, are men, Caucasians, bored or disillusioned by the daily grind of corporate America. I’ve talked to a lot of those guys over these years, and I am surprised how many make career changes to professions that they feel will enable them to do worthwhile work.

I have also spent more time in French hospitals than I ever could have imagined. My impression is that French “socialized” medicine, with much less technological gadgetry, is better than American ultra-technical medicine. There came a day in our lives when my wife needed a brain scan and there were only two MRIs in the country, and the one in Marseille was broken.

On another day, you try to pay the surgeon at Institute Rothschild who saved your wife’s life, and he says: “I work for a government salary. I’ve never taken a dime and I don’t intend to start now.” So you send him a case of good Chateauneuf du Pape.

The difference is that you have a true one-on-one relationship with a real person in France, rather than the “team” system used by America’s best research hospitals. The teams, in green and white, come in and take their readings and measurements, and then march into the hall. Then you find they have put a “central line” backward into an artery rather than a vein. Your wife has a stroke.

Now we are told that the United States has a shortage of physicians, particularly primary care physicians, family doctors. The money is in dermatology and cosmetic surgery. Why deal with some kid with whooping cough—to pay off your six-figure tuition loans—when you can do nose jobs?

American medical care is still getting by with Medicare, machines built by General Electric, and doctors and nurses from India and the Philippines. And with the blind faith of Americans that we have the best medical care in the world. A myth.

As you know, we have national academies to train soldiers, sailors and airmen, probably the best in the world. No tuition.

Why not medical academies? The U.S. social welfare and medical system was built on the assumption that people, on average, would live to 65. No longer. People are now living well into their 80s in relatively good health. That’s why Social Security will face crisis after crisis. That is why Medicare and Medicaid will eventually collapse. Our “safety net” was designed in the 1930s. Different time. Different problems.


Tags: , , ,

3 responses to “What we should be teaching…”

  1. gavinpandion says :

    I’d like to add to this. As an international health researcher, I see the cost of our underinvestment in medical workforce training to fill jobs in poor countries. It worsens the problem of brain drain by making medical training abroad an easy ticket to a better life in the U.S. I know that sounds harsh to the overseas-trained health workers treating our patients and trying to provide the best for their own families, but health care systems in poor countries are in horrible shape and a large part of the problem is under-staffing that is far more extreme than in the U.S. More and more health programs for the poor in the developing countries are being designed to be feasible with staff who have virtually no medical expertise (called “Community Health Workers”), because these are the only workers the health systems can really afford to rely on for health care provision. We hear about the catastrophic epidemics like AIDS in Africa, but the reality is that primary health care services are so abysmal that it is often easier to get care for a hot-button issue like AIDS in a country with relatively low HIV prevalence and many more pressing threats to health that are somehow more difficult to address with the available resources. Much of AIDS treatment is subsidized with outside funding, which makes it somewhat easier to provide than basic health care for other ailments, not that access to the necessary care for living with AIDS is in any way adequate either, but there is a noticeable imbalance in terms of resource allocation. Rational antibiotic use for instance is not really being taken seriously in the developing world, and while we often talk about the coming plagues that will be well-equipped to overcome our borders and our best drugs, our problems will be slight compared to the residents of the countries cultivating multi-drug resistance.

  2. thejumbledmind says :

    Excellent insight. Thank you for commenting!

  3. michelinewalker says :

    They should work for a government salary.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: